Wednesday, December 21, 2011

Flight 800 and 870

http://www.netowne.com/conspiracy/conspiracies/downing.htm
Excerpt:
4. When Mr. Clinton signed the Iran, Libya Sanctions Act of 1996, a decision was made by the Iranian Supreme Council to approve attacks on major American targets. Terrorist surrogate groups from nine countries were summoned to Tehran to meet with Iranian officials in June of 1996. Later that month, a huge truck bomb was deployed against the US Air Force barracks complex at Khobar Towers in Saudi Arabia. Three weeks later, TWA Flight 800 was shot down only hours after an explicit warning of an attack was received in London and Washington that taunted the President.


TWA 800: Commander William S. Donaldson USN/Ret
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b3Rg-3L4AI0

http://whatreallyhappened.com/RANCHO/CRASH/TWA/twa.php
Excerpt:









PROOF THE INVESTIGATION IS POLITICALLY DIRECTED.


Joe Brancatelli on Business Travel
 



Airlines Feared a 'Friendly Fire' Disaster; Have We Had Our 
First?



 Joe Brancatelli 


July 21, 1997



A day after the downing of TWA 800 last July, an executive 
of an international airline invited me to lunch. From the 
moment I slid into the banquette at his stodgy private 
club, I knew this was going to be a different kind of lunch 
altogether."So what's your take on TWA 800?" the executive 
asked before I could settle in.The question stunned me. 
Over all the years I had known this guy, he never 
speculated on matters of safety or security, and once said 
sourly, "Never say 'crash' to an airline guy" when I 
jokingly asked about the "crash" of his company stock 
price."Well," I stammered. "I mean, there's no 'good' news 
here. If it was a missile, there's gonna be hell to pay. If 
it was terrorism, the recriminations and the security 
measures will be positively fascist. And if it was 
mechanical, it was catastrophic failure like we've never 
seen before.""It was a missile," the executive said evenly. 
"Friendly fire. We kept telling the military this would 
happen one day. And the bastards just kept doing it and 
doing it. And now hundreds of people are dead."I didn't say 
anything. We didn't even have water on the table yet and 
here was this wild accusation from an airline guy I 
considered Mr. Button Down. I took a quick mental inventory 
of what I knew about him: He was former military, his son 
was a TWA pilot, and we'd had a brief conversation a couple 
of months back when one of his airline's planes was chased 
by two military fighter jets across the North Pacific."What 
are we talking about?" I finally managed to mumble.Grimly, 
the executive laid out his theory: TWA 800 took off, was 
picked up on radar by U.S. fighters, and then was made the 
"target" by a giddy pilot. As so often happens, this 
military pilot was playing an ad hoc war game: lock onto a 
commercial jet, make believe its an enemy plane, then blow 
it out of the sky. Only this time, the executive insisted, 
something went terribly wrong and the game turned real."For 
years we've been complaining about the military locking 
onto commercial jets and using them for target practice," 
the executive said. "We go down to the Pentagon and bitch 
and they promise it'll never happen again. Then, when it 
does happen again, the brass says, 'no harm, no foul.' I 
think they just fouled."Over the course of this very 
peculiar lunch, the airline executive also laid out several 
eerie scenarios: Watch the government attempt to discredit, 
then ignore, then awkwardly explain away the eyewitness 
accounts that support the "missile theory." Watch the 
President make an unprecedented gesture to the families of 
the TWA 800 victims. Watch how the cockpit recorders will 
reveal no signs of crew comments indicating mechanical 
failure. Watch how a mechanical problem will be vaguely 
blamed, yet no 747s will be grounded.Most of all, he said, 
"Watch the players.""What do you mean, 'Watch the 
players?'""Joe," he said, as if quizzing a befuddled child, 
"Who has the statutory authority to investigate air crashes 
in this country?""Well," I said, "The National 
Transportation Safety Board, except if...""Except if there 
is criminal activity involved and then the FBI is in the 
mix.""So," I wondered, "What's the point?""Like I said, 
watch the players. Forget about what they say and what they 
do. Eventually, they will tell you its not a bomb, it not 
a missile, its a mechanical. But watch how the FBI doesn't 
go away. If its a mechanical, the FBI has no legal 
authority to be anywhere near the NTSB. But watch how the 
FBI will never go away."I left that luncheon scared. I 
wondered how a right-thinking, by-the-book airline 
executive become a conspiracy freak.Except...Except how 
come no airline executive I know thinks this luncheon 
conversation was strange? How come, whenever I ask about 
TWA 800, they obsess about the number of times their 
aircraft have been "targets" of military jets playing war 
games?Except how come everything that airline executive 
predicted during that lunch has come true?The government 
has gone to extraordinary--sometimes laughable--lengths to 
discredit, ignore, then explain away eyewitness accounts. 
President Clinton and the First Lady did take the 
unprecedented step of flying to Kennedy Airport to console 
the families of the TWA 800 victims. They didn't fly to 
Detroit in January to comfort the families of the victims 
of the Comair crash and they didn't go to Florida to 
comfort the families of last year's ValuJet crash. How come 
the cockpit recorders didn't yield any clue of a mechanical 
failure? How come no 747s have been grounded if there 
really is a catastrophic problem with their center fuel 
tanks?And, how come, if you watch the players, the FBI is 
still intimately involved with the investigation more than 
a year out?Deputy FBI director James Kallstrom has shadowed 
the NTSB since the moment TWA 800 went down. He tells 
anyone who listens that there's no evidence of a bomb or a 
missile. Yet he told Congress as recently as July 10 the 
FBI will remain involved in what should otherwise be 
strictly NTSB business.Something is very wrong here, fellow 
travelers. Very wrong. 

Joe Brancatelli, a veteran business journalist based in 
Cold Spring, New York, writes weekly on business travel for 
TheTrip.com. He also has written for a wide range of print 
publications, including the Los Angeles Times and Fortune 
magazine.

http://www.portfolio.com/business-travel/2011/07/27/budget-fight-hits-faa-and-essential-air-service/
Excerpt:

The Odd Case of Taxpayer Subsidies to Small Airports

The federal government's Essential Air Service is fast becoming the metaphoric poster boy for wasteful government spending, entrenched interests, political gridlock, and a greedy airline industry.

http://whatreallyhappened.com/RANCHO/CRASH/TWA/MORE_DOWN/itavia.html
Excerpt:
In 1987 an Italian court opened its own investigation of the unsolved disaster, and arranged for the recovery of a majority of the aircraft's wreckage which included the flight data recorder.That investigation continues at the present time, almost 17 years after the accident.
One persistent allegation has been that American or French naval aircraft launched an air-to-air missile at a Libyan fighter aircraft detected in the area. The target aircraft had not responded to initial challenges, and flew into a position that placed the Itavia DC-9 between itself and the allied aircraft. The radar returns from the Libyan jet became those of the civilian airliner as it positioned itself inside the larger plane's radar silhouette. The missile then locked on to the larger aircraft and brought it down, according to this theory.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aerolinee_Itavia_Flight_870
Excerpt:
Missile strike during training exercise
This involves NATO forces accidentally downing the DC-9 during an international exercise involving Italian, U.S., and French jet fighters. Aviation Week and Space Technology reported that damage had been found consistent with a continuous-rod warhead, which would have had to have come from an anti-aircraft missile.

[edit] Missile strike during military operation

Major sources in the Italian media have alleged over the years that the aircraft was shot down during a dog fight involving Libyan, U.S., French and Italian Air Force fighters in an assassination attempt by NATO members on an important Libyan politician, maybe even the leader Muammar al-Gaddafi, who was flying in the same airspace that evening. Gaddafi denied being in the area of the accident that evening. This version was supported in particular by investigative magistrate Rosario Priore in 1999.[5] Judge Priore said in his concluding report that his investigation had been deliberately obstructed by the Italian military and members of the secret service, in compliance with NATO requests.[5]
The media also reported that radar monitoring records released in 1997 by NATO showed that at least seven fighter aircraft were in the vicinity when the jet plunged into the sea off the island of Ustica. According to these sources, the radar shows that one or two Libyan MiG-23 had tried to evade detection by flying close to the airliner. Three Italian Air Force F-104S, one U.S. Navy A-7 Corsair II and a French fighter pursued the Libyan MiG-23 and a battle ensued.
On July 18, 1980, 21 days after the crash, a Libyan MiG-23 crashed on the Sila Mountains in Castelsilano, Calabria, southern Italy, according to eye witnesses and official reports. Media rumors reported that the plane may actually only have been discovered at that time, and that the pilot's body was decomposed; this gave rise to allegations that the MiG-23 may have been shot down at the time of the Flight 870 incident.[6]
According to the Italian media, documents from the archives of the Libyan secret service passed on to Human Rights Watch after the fall of Tripoli, show that Flight 870 and the Libyan MIG were attacked by two

http://www.twa800.com/smoking-gun.htm
Excerpt:
So what does this all mean?  Why would the government want to cover-up a missile attack on Flight 800?  If you will remember, the crash occurred 3 days before the start of the Atlanta Olympics and 4 months before the 1996 presidential election.  Leaving politics aside, if the public realized that Flight 800 had been shot down, it would have had a devastating effect on the airline industry and the economy as a whole as we saw after 9/11.  The president may well have felt justified in keeping this quiet for national security reasons, and it would have only taken a few key people, like Jim Kallstrom, to keep demanding more proof until there is no alternative left except a mysterious mechanical failure theory that itself cannot be duplicated in any laboratory.


No comments:

Post a Comment