Tuesday, June 14, 2011

More on aids and HIV

Clinton NWO
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1etgsNU46s4

Clinton How Dare You
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vU-nMsyXP0s

http://cambodia.usembassy.gov/key_officers.html
Excerpt:
Mission Officers
  • Political/Economic Chief: Gregory Lawless
  • Centers for Disease Control Director: Carol Ciesielski
  • Consular Chief: Brian Lieke
  • Defense Attaché: Col. Michael Dembroski
  • Legal Attaché: Laro Tan
  • Management Officer: Scott Covert
  • Peace Corps Director: Jonathan Darrah
  • Public Affairs Officer: John Johnson
  • USAID Director: Erin Soto
http://tmh.floonet.net/articles/poisoned.shtml
Excerpts:
1) The CDC team included such EIS members as Harold Jaffe, Ruth Berkelman, and Carol Ciesielski.
2) Margaret Fischl, the head of the Phase II AZT trial, worked at that medical center, which had serves as one of the twelve facilities sponsored by Burroughs Wellcome for the study. So Bergalis was prescribed AZT.110

http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/aids/interviews/fischl.html
Excerpst:

1) As a young physician working in South Florida during the early 1980s, Dr. Margaret Fischl struggled to find the source of mysterious immune problems among her male and female heterosexual patients of Haitian ancestry. When she read the initial reports of similar immune problems in gay men in California, she called the CDC to report her cases, but she says they didn't accept her conclusions because her patients didn't fit the profile of the mysterious disease being transmitted through homosexual sex or drug use. Eventually, the CDC named Haitian ancestry as a separate risk factor for AIDS -- stigmatizing and angering Haitians in the U.S. and abroad. Here, she recounts those events, and her trips to Haiti to investigate the disease there. Later, Fischl was one of the first researchers to discover the cancer drug AZT's effectiveness in treating AIDS patients. She describes those clinical trials and the criticism she faced from activists as doctors and patients learned more about the drug's toxic side effects. This is an edited transcript of an interview conducted Jan. 19, 2005.

2) Why didn't the CDC believe you? Did they not believe you because your patients were not gay?
I think in first dealing with the CDC, I have to say, as much as I respect them, they were fixed into how this was being transmitted. It was being seen among gay men and was sexually transmitted; it was being transmitted among drug users, so that was blood transmission. From my perspective it was sexual transmission and therefore heterosexuals, homosexuals -- at that point it really didn't matter. I didn't think there was anything particularly different. When you look back, it was just the total number of exposures is why you saw it originally among gay men, because the total number of contacts was so much higher.
Looking back with the CDC, they had a lot of difficulty. They began looking at all different types of aspects: Did they have unusual rituals in Haiti, voodoo rituals? Did they inadvertently have homosexual contacts? It took a while for them to accept that this was really heterosexual transmission, and I must say that was, from my perspective, an ongoing interaction with the CDC for a good five or six years. ...

http://aids.about.com/cs/profiles/p/jaffe.htm
Harold Jaffe MD
Harold Jaffe MD
Centers for Disease Control

Background:
One man has been on the forefront of HIV throughout the history of HIV. Dr. Harold Jaffe received his BA from the University of California, Berkeley and his MD from the University of California, Los Angeles. In 1971, he joined The Centers of Disease Control (CDC)as a clinical research investigator with the venereal disease control program. In 1981, he became an Epidemic Intelligence Service Officer and joined the CDC Task Force assigned to study the earliest cases of AIDS; securing his spot in the history of HIV.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_disability-related_terms_with_negative_connotations
Excerpt:

List of disability-related terms with negative connotations

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
The following is a list of terms used to describe people with disabilities or disabilities, these terms may be considered negative and/or offensive by people with or without disabilities.
There is a great deal of disagreement as to what should be considered offensive. Views vary with geography and culture, over time, and among individuals. Some of the terms, such as "retard" and "lame," are deliberate insults; others, such as "wheelchair-bound," are inherently negative; still others, such as "Mongolism," are based on stereotypical ideas of certain groups of individuals with disabilities.
Many other terms' inclusion of this list can be disputed because they are highly interpretable. For example, some people consider the word "handicapped" to be derogatory, while others see it as a synonym for "a person with a disability"; and it is still used by some people with disabilities. Certain people are offended by such terms, while others are offended by the replacement of such terms with what they consider to be euphemisms (e.g., "differently abled" or "special needs"). Some people believe that terms should be avoided if they might offend people; others hold the listener responsible for misinterpreting terms used in a non-offensive context.
Finally, some people with disabilities are choosing to reclaim certain terms, using them to describe themselves with high-impact effect. This reclaiming of hurtful words takes the power away from those who intend to use them to put others down. Reclaiming a term gives it a positive meaning when used by the people it describes, but it is still considered a slur when used by others:
Contents:Top   A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z    References 

[edit] A

[edit] B

  • "Brain problems" A term making out that the person does not have fully functioning brain and is incapable of acting rationally. Offensive because of being general and being used to describe illness that is beyond the individuals control.

[edit] C

  • Cripple used to mean "a person with a physical or mobility impairment." Its shortened form, "crip" is often used by firebrand people with disabilities as a term of endearment. See also the essay On Being a Cripple by Nancy Mairs.




http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HIV/AIDS_in_Haiti
Excerpt:

HIV/AIDS in Haiti

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Haiti has one of the highest HIV/AIDS rates in the entire Caribbean.[1] By the end of 2005, the national HIV prevalence among adults aged 15 to 49 was 3.8 percent[2] but has since decreased to 2.2 percent by the end of 2008 due to effective HIV/AIDS education programs, and increased standard of medical treatment.


In Haiti, HIV is primarily transmitted through heterosexual contact, followed by mother-to-infant transmission. The recent declines in HIV infection rates are most notable in urban areas, and have been attributed to significant behavioral changes, including decreased number of partners, decreased sexual debut, and increased condom use. Other explanations for the recent trends include AIDS-related mortality and improvements made in blood safety early in the epidemic. Continued political instability, high internal migration rates, high prevalence of sexually transmitted infections, and weakened health and social services persist as factors with potential negative impacts on the epidemic. Antiretroviral coverage in Haiti is minimal for rural populations, people in prostitution, and men who have sex with men — ultimately reaching more than 87 percent of the people who need it.[2][dead link]


Top Down Brainwashing
http://www.terryfrei.com/id3.html
Excerpst:
1) The week leading up to the showdown saw black student groups at Arkansas, still marginalized and targets of virulent abuse, protesting and seeking to end the use of the song "Dixie" to celebrate Razorback touchdowns; students were determined to rush the field during the game if the band struck up the tune. As the United States remained mired in the Vietnam War, sign-wielding demonstrators (including war veterans) took up their positions outside the stadium -- in full view of the president. That same week, Rhodes Scholar Bill Clinton penned a letter to the head of the ROTC program at the University of Arkansas, thanking the colonel for shielding him from induction into the military earlier in the year.
2)
bigshootoutpoliticos.jpg
President Richard Nixon in the Razorback Stadium stands at the Big Shootout. At left in his row are Arkansas Congressman John Paul Hammerschmidt, also a decorated World War II pilot; and Arkansas Governor Winthrop Rockefeller. To the right of Nixon are Arkansas senators John McClellan and J. William Fulbright, a Nixon nemesis. Fulbright, one of the Senate's leading anti-Vietnam War voices, had been a football star, student body president and also the university president at Arkansas before going into politics. Next to him is a very young-looking Texas Congressman, George Bush, who was (and still is) one of Hammerschmidt's close friends. If you look real hard in the row behind them, you can spot the top of Henry Kissinger's head and his glasses. Both Hammerschmidt and Bush contributed their memories of that day for Horns, Hogs, and Nixon Coming.

http://haiti.clintonfoundation.org/news_and_media_listall_type.php?type=press%20releases
Excerpt:
2010-12-02

$800,000 for Haiti Rebuilding Center to Support Reconstruction and Livelihoods

The Clinton Bush Haiti Fund announced an $816,472 grant to Architecture for Humanity, in support of the Haiti Rebuilding Center in Port-au-Prince. This grant will enable small and growing Haitian businesses to participate in post-earthquake reconstruction and ensure rebuilding incorporates better design and engineering

http://www.smirkingchimp.com/thread/robert-parry/36051/the-curious-bush-bin-laden-symbiosis
Excerpt:
The hunt for bin Laden was soon put on the back burner. As the Washington Post reported on Friday, “A few months after Tora Bora, as part of the preparation for war in Iraq, the Bush administration pulled out many of the Special Operations and CIA forces that had been searching for bin Laden in Afghanistan, according to several U.S officials who served at the time.”
Just six months after 9/11 and three months after bin Laden evaded capture at Tora Bora, Bush personally began downplaying the importance of capturing al-Qaeda's leader. “I don’t know where he is,” Bush told a news conference. “I really just don’t spend that much time on him, to be honest with you.”
Using Osama
Yet, with bin Laden at large, Bush enjoyed an advantage. He could use the specter of bin Laden as an all-purpose bogeyman to scare the American people. A living bin Laden allowed Bush to create a plausible scenario for additional al-Qaeda attacks inside the United States and thus the justification for Bush to assert unprecedented powers as Commander in Chief.
http://blogs.poz.com/regan/archives/2011/05/osama_bin_laden_hiv_aids.html

With Osama Bin Laden Gone, Can AIDS Be Public Enemy #1?

Excerpt:
It's often when we feel safest that the worst stuff happens to us.
I contracted HIV in a moment like that. I was so sure I didn't need to worry any more about getting AIDS. And that's when the virus surprise attacked me.

Vigilance is the way to steel against future problems.

And so, while we celebrate a moment that clearly is a step forward in the United States' effort to fight terror around the world, we should also not relax into a false state of security.

That said, hopefully, we will now be able to breathe a little easier and redirect some resources to the front lines of others battles.

It is my job to advocate for the fight against HIV/AIDS. And so with that in mind, I offer this suggestion: Why not make AIDS public enemy #1 now that Osama Bin Laden's death has freed up that slot?

President Obama has just orchestrated the death of one of the world's most deadly terrorists.  Perhaps his next move should be to orchestrate the death of one of the world's most deadly viruses.

AIDS qualifies on every level as an adequate replacement for Bin Laden. And, as we head towards the 30th anniversary of the first reported cases of what we now know to be AIDS (June 5, 2011), it is high time we put AIDS back in the spotlight so we can wipe it off the planet.

Bin Laden was a dangerous man, responsible for the deaths of thousands of innocent people, many of whom were American.

HIV has killed 25 million and currently resides within the bodies of 33.3 million more. Only six million of the 33.3 million people can get their hands on lifesaving medical care. Which means the lives of 27.3 million people (and counting as new infections occur daily) are at risk. Without antiretroviral medication, most of the 27.3 million will die.

HIV is a helluva terrorist.

Bin Laden's death proves that when the United States of America puts their best minds, strongest people and biggest resources behind a problem, we get it done.

Let's set our sites on AIDS next.

Can you imagine if Obama started his next presidential campaign being able to claim he eliminated the most dangerous terrorist on earth--and funded the discovery for the cure for AIDS?

No comments:

Post a Comment